A short Monday note for founders.
No news. No hype. Just what I’m seeing — and a few moves to set the week up properly.
(And yes — it’s Christmas week 🎄)
What I’m Seeing
I spent this week running the 100 Problem Fit Challenge on a real idea — and building the system to manage it properly.
Not pitch feedback.
Not vibes.
Not “interesting conversations”.
Actual interviews. Logged quotes. Severity scores. Trade-offs.
And the pattern was immediate:
Most founders aren’t building the wrong solution.
They’re building before they’ve proved the problem is painful enough.
Confident hypotheses collapsed fast once founders had to capture:
real language from the wild
how much the problem actually slows someone down
what people would give up to make it disappear
Some problems evaporated.
Some sharpened.
Some flipped entirely.
The biggest realisation wasn’t philosophical — it was practical:
Problem-fit isn’t intuition.
It’s pattern recognition at volume.
Without volume, founders mistake interest for pain.
With volume, the truth shows up whether you like it or not.
The 100 Challenge, Ship the Truth
The 100 Challenge was born from watching too many founders pour time, resources and money into building startups that, frankly, nobody needed. Testing your big idea on a sample size of one (even if that one is your mum) isn’t problem-fit. Whether it’s the instant a spark of inspiration hits or you’re halfway down the road to changing the world, this is the most crucial step you’ll ever take.
⭐️ AI for Startups this Tuesday
I know it’s the day before the day before Christmas — BUT this is one not to miss if you’re building with AI (or trying to make sense of it without the fluff).
Join us online for a practical session with live demos + real fixes:
→ The real signals in AI
→ Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO) implementation (AJ)
→ Founder demo: AI chat personalities + takeaway framework (Leah)
→ AI tech explained, properly (Manny)
→ Open Q&A: live blockers, direct fixes
Why This Matters
Most “validation” work is theatre.
Pitch decks.
Landing pages.
Ad tests.
People saying “I’d use this”.
None of that answers the only question that matters:
Is this painful enough that someone will trade time, money, or effort to make it go away?
Once you structure the work properly — interviews, themes, bias checks, Five Whys, economic trade-offs — you stop debating yourself.
The data makes the call.
That’s the difference between building with confidence…
and building to stay busy.
A Few Moves I’d Make this week
Write one clear problem hypothesis.
One sentence. No solution. Be willing to be wrong.
Collect language before opinions.
Pull 20+ real pain phrases from LinkedIn, X, Reddit, sales calls — before interviews.Run interviews as pattern mining, not chats.
Same questions. Logged properly. No leading.Force the trade-off question.
If they wouldn’t give up time, money, or effort — it’s not a real problem yet.
If this sparked questions, I’m opening the floor inside the Fusion42 community this week — no slides, no agenda. Just real founder questions and honest answers.
One Thing to Keep in Mind
Clarity doesn’t come from thinking harder.
It comes from putting structure around reality and letting it speak.
Most founders rush to build because uncertainty is uncomfortable.
Ironically, a few disciplined weeks proving the problem removes more risk than months of shipping ever will.
Prove the pain first.
Then build — or walk away early and free yourself to work on something that actually matters.
That’s not slower.
That’s leverage.
If you’re reading this instead of wrapping presents, you’re my people.
Do one smart thing today — then step away.
Merry Christmas. 🎄
Arthur is the AI native startup operating system I’m building in public — not hype, but a system that turns input into structured execution and tracks founder progress. If you want to follow or use it, it’s open for early access.
→ Access Arthur
Enjoy and hope to see you soon.
❤️ & ✌🏼
Thank you for reading. If you liked it, share it with your friends, colleagues and everyone interested in the startup Investor ecosystem.
If you've got suggestions, an article, research, your tech stack, or a job listing you want featured, just let me know! I'm keen to include it in the upcoming edition.
Please let me know what you think of it, love a feedback loop 🙏🏼
🛑 Get a different job.
Subscribe below and follow me on LinkedIn or Twitter to never miss an update.







