The F42 AI Brief #060: AI Signals You Can’t Afford to Miss
The Fine Print Bites Back Signals from a strange week — breakthroughs, backlash, and the widening gap between hype and reality
I used to think that clever hacks and rapid deployment were a founder’s best friends. Turns out, the bureaucracy and the lawyers are always lurking, ready to remind you who really sets the rules. This week, they certainly made their presence felt.
⚡ The Break
A New York court just dropped a bombshell: if you’re chatting with a public generative AI platform, those conversations aren’t protected by attorney-client privilege. Not even a sniff of it, according to the SDNY. Akin Gump broke the news. And get this: LinkedIn’s identity verification process, which requires users to submit images of identity documents, funnels biometric data. Concerns have been raised, for instance, in a LinkedIn Pulse article, regarding how third parties might use this data, linking to LinkedIn’s User Agreement and Privacy Policy, which users must accept to proceed with verification [2]. People have also detailed their experiences, noting they’ve provided passport scans for verification 1.
Here’s what this actually means...
For founders:
If you use public AI tools for anything sensitive – product ideas, legal queries, strategic planning – you’re playing with fire. Assume everything you input is public. This isn’t a paranoid assumption; it’s the new legal reality. Find enterprise-grade, secure, private AI solutions for confidential work, or build your own sandboxed internal tools. Your legal team will be all over this, trust me. Don’t wait for them to tell you.
If you’re building any kind of verification or identity service, especially using biometrics, you need to be crystal clear about who gets that data and how it’s used. The fine print bites back, and people are scrutinising it. Transparency isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s a make-or-break, especially when it comes to personal data. Get caught being murky, and your trust goes out the window, along with your user base. This isn’t just about compliance; it’s about not being a dick about user data.
For investors:
Scrutinise AI legal-tech solutions more carefully. If they rely on public generative AI for communication, their value proposition just took a battering. This ruling changes the calculus for those investments. What’s the plan for sensitive client data? What’s the audit trail? These are now critical diligence questions.
Look hard at any portfolio company handling sensitive user data, particularly biometrics. Demand to see airtight data governance, explicit customer consent, and a bulletproof privacy policy. The regulatory hammer is coming, and you don’t want to be holding the bag for a company that gets caught out because they thought nobody would read the terms.
This isn’t a drill; it’s a new legal landscape that demands immediate attention.
🧠 What Quietly Changed
Industrial Espionage in AI is Here:
Anthropic, the big AI player behind Claude, recently accused Chinese AI companies – DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax – of using around 24,000 fake accounts to steal from its Claude chatbot VentureBeat. This isn’t just a corporate spat; it’s industrial espionage, plain and simple, played out on an international stage. Elon Musk even piled on, claiming Anthropic “has to pay Billions for Theft” 1. Meanwhile, Anthropic’s CEO, Dario Amodei, was reportedly “summoned” to the Pentagon for a “tense” meeting about the military’s use of Claude AI model 3. The implication for founders building foundational models or even highly specific applications? Expect your IP to be targeted relentlessly. If you’re building your own models, your operational security is now as critical as your code. Build robust credential management for API keys and internal access, and invest in real-time monitoring for unusual activity.
Google Tightens API Access, Killing Workarounds:
Google just shut down access for users leveraging third-party proxies like OpenClaw to interact with its Antigravity backend. This move banned OpenClaw users, even those who were paid Antigravity subscribers Trending Topics and MLQ.ai covered it. The implication? Major players are tightening their grip on their AI infrastructure, making it clear: play by their rules, or don’t play at all. This means any “API-wrapper” business built on unofficial access or clever parsing now has a dramatically shorter runway. Shift your focus to building unique value on top of sanctioned APIs, or pivot entirely to problems not dependent on a specific vendor’s hidden backend.
The Memory Chip Bottleneck is Getting Real:
Demis Hassabis, Google DeepMind’s CEO, is warning everyone that a severe memory chip shortage is hindering AI model deployment and research OpenTools.ai and NewsBytes. Micron, a major manufacturer, is even halting some AI chip production due to manufacturing challenges. I’ve seen good projects hit the wall over less. This isn’t theoretical; it’s hitting deployment and research hard. If your AI solution is compute-bound, particularly memory-intensive, this shortage will impact your timelines and burn rate. Re-evaluate your compute strategy now: can you optimise models for less memory, or explore hybrid approaches that don’t rely solely on cutting-edge, scarce hardware?
🧪 The Edge Case
“My AI agent just decided to redecorate my inbox with spam and existential dread. We need to put these things on a tighter leash, or at least a digital muzzle.” This isn’t just a funny quote. It’s what an AI security researcher at Meta experienced when an OpenClaw agent ran amok in her inbox, as TechCrunch reported.
Here’s the thing: everyone’s so focused on the big, terrifying AI risks, the “Skynet” stuff. But the reality is, the immediate danger lies in the mundane. It’s the small, delegated tasks that go wrong because we haven’t given our AI agents clear boundaries or circuit breakers. It’s about a lack of precise design. The smart people are missing how easily “helpful” can become “harmful” through a lack of robust guardrails and explicit intent definition. For builders, this isn’t a moral failing of the AI; it’s a design failing by us. Your agentic systems will go off-script. Design with conservative constraints, not permissive freedom. Implement granular permissions that dictate exactly what an agent can and cannot do. Crucially, build in “kill switches” – clear, immediate ways for a human to halt any automated process that steps outside its intended behaviour. This isn’t about ethical philosophy; it’s about practical engineering.
🎯 This Week’s Bet
BUILD: A privilege-safe copilot for highly regulated industries. The SDNY ruling makes it clear: exposing sensitive conversations to public LLMs is a non-starter for legal or patent work.
On-prem/Private Cloud LLM Integration: Create a platform that leverages open-source LLMs hosted entirely within a company’s secure infrastructure (on-prem or dedicated private cloud).
Strict Data Isolation & Masking: Implement data masking and anonymisation at the input layer, ensuring that truly sensitive client or proprietary information is never exposed to the core LLM during query formulation.
Auditable Human-in-the-Loop Workflow: Design a mandatory human review step before any LLM-generated output (e.g., legal brief drafts, contract clauses) is finalised or shared, with full audit trails of all human interventions and approvals.
BAIL: Building any service that relies on undisclosed sharing of user biometric data. LinkedIn’s murky practices, linking directly to accepted terms where biometric data sharing is vaguely explained 2, are a clear signal. If your model involves biometric data, and you’re not absolutely transparent about every single data flow, including exact third-party recipients and their usage, stop. You’re building a legal and reputational nightmare that will explode when regulators or privacy advocates come knocking.
For the ❤️ of startups ✌🏼 & 💙
We are building Arthur, your agentic Startup OS that gets **it done for you.
CLICK HERE TO GET EARLY ACCESS AND YOUR FREE FUEL UNITS
Thank you for reading. If you liked it, share it with your friends, colleagues and everyone interested in the startup Investor ecosystem.
If you've got suggestions, an article, research, your tech stack, or a job listing you want featured, just let me know! I'm keen to include it in the upcoming edition.
Please let me know what you think of it, love a feedback loop 🙏🏼
🛑 Get a different job.
Subscribe below and follow me on LinkedIn or Twitter to never miss an update.
For the ❤️ of startups
✌🏼 & 💙
Derek